Showing posts with label javascriptcore. Show all posts
Showing posts with label javascriptcore. Show all posts

2015-02-26

Numeric CombSort Benchmark update!

As I've written before, CombSort are quite good sort algorithm. Let's compare this algorithm when implemented in various programming language. The benchmark should not use any other built-in function other than array generation and printing. The benchmark uses AMD A8-6600K, 16GB RAM with Non-SSD disk.

$ alias | grep 'alias time'
alias time='/usr/bin/time -f "\nCPU: %Us\tReal: %es\tRAM: %MKB"'
$ time --version
GNU time 1.7

g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.9.2 20141224 (prerelease)
$ time g++ comb.cpp
CPU: 0.05s      Real: 0.12s     RAM: 19428KB
$ time ./a.out
CPU: 1.94s      Real: 1.97s     RAM: 79804KB
$ time g++ -O2 comb.cpp
CPU: 0.07s      Real: 0.11s     RAM: 21260KB
$ time ./a.out
CPU: 0.88s      Real: 0.90s     RAM: 79804KB

clang --version
clang version 3.5.1 (tags/RELEASE_351/final)
$ time clang++ comb.cpp
CPU: 0.05s      Real: 0.08s     RAM: 33564KB
$ time ./a.out
CPU: 1.83s      Real: 1.86s     RAM: 79764KB
$ time clang++ -O2 comb.cpp
CPU: 0.08s      Real: 0.14s     RAM: 37860KB
$ time ./a.out
CPU: 0.89s      Real: 0.91s     RAM: 79804KB

java -version
java version "1.7.0_71" 
$ time javac comb.java
CPU: 1.05s      Real: 0.73s     RAM: 65952KB
$ time java comb
CPU: 1.32s      Real: 1.32s     RAM: 110488KB

php --version
PHP 5.6.4 (cli) (built: Dec 17 2014 21:45:04)
$ time php comb.php
CPU: 102.69s    Real: 104.20s   RAM: 2497508KB

hhvm --version
HipHop VM 3.5.0 (rel)
$ time hhvm -v Eval.Jit=true comb.php 
CPU: 12.56s     Real: 14.83s    RAM: 362488KB

ruby --version
ruby 2.2.0p0 (2014-12-25 revision 49005) [x86_64-linux]
$ time ruby comb.rb
CPU: 52.87s     Real: 53.02s    RAM: 87892KB

rbx --version
rubinius 2.5.2 (2.1.0 7a5b05b1 2015-01-30 3.5.1 JI) [x86_64-linux-gnu]
$ time rbx comb.rb
CPU: 74.89s     Real: 74.30s    RAM: 135320KB

node --version
v0.10.35
$ time node comb1.js
CPU: 2.64s      Real: 2.64s     RAM: 92240KB
$ time node comb2.js
CPU: 2.68s      Real: 2.72s     RAM: 140612KB

rhino < /dev/null 
Rhino 1.7 release 4 2014 07 01
$ rhino comb2.js
CPU: 87.39s     Real: 61.16s    RAM: 1993848KB

$ pacman -Qo `which jsc-3`
/usr/bin/jsc-3 is owned by webkitgtk 2.4.8-1
$ time jsc-3 comb1.js
CPU: 23.74s     Real: 23.93s    RAM: 93740KB
$ time jsc-3 comb2.js
CPU: 18.99s     Real: 19.16s    RAM: 181644KB

js24 --help | grep Version
Version: JavaScript-C24.2.0
$ time js24 --ion-eager comb1.js
CPU: 2.13s      Real: 2.15s     RAM: 89688KB
$ time js24 --ion-eager comb2.js
CPU: 1.53s      Real: 1.58s     RAM: 92384KB

go version
go version go1.4.1 linux/amd64
$ time go build comb.go 
CPU: 0.14s      Real: 0.17s     RAM: 31568KB
$ time ./comb
CPU: 1.10s      Real: 1.14s     RAM: 79824KB

rustc --version
rustc 1.0.0-dev
$ time rustc comb.rs
CPU: 0.39s      Real: 0.49s     RAM: 106844KB
$ time ./comb
CPU: 10.62s     Real: 10.71s    RAM: 86020KB
$ time rustc -O comb.rs
CPU: 0.41s      Real: 0.49s     RAM: 110204KB
$ time ./comb
CPU: 0.97s      Real: 0.99s     RAM: 86108KB

scala -version
Scala code runner version 2.11.5 -- Copyright 2002-2013, LAMP/EPFL
$ time scala comb.scala
CPU: 5.43s      Real: 6.30s     RAM: 206088KB
$ time scalac comb.scala
CPU: 10.62s     Real: 7.00s     RAM: 143460KB
$ time scala Comb
CPU: 5.49s      Real: 5.05s     RAM: 206300KB

python --version
Python 3.4.2
$ time python comb1.py
CPU: 90.47s     Real: 90.83s    RAM: 403192KB
$ time python comb2.py
CPU: 106.82s    Real: 107.26s   RAM: 87248KB

pypy --version
Python 2.7.8 (c6ad44ecf5d8, Nov 18 2014, 18:04:31) [PyPy 2.4.0 with GCC 4.9.2]
$ time pypy comb1.py
CPU: 5.34s      Real: 5.40s     RAM: 136764KB
$ time pypy comb2.py
CPU: 5.85s      Real: 6.04s     RAM: 204588KB

mcs --version
Mono C# compiler version 3.12.0.0
$ time mcs -o+ comb.cs
CPU: 0.44s      Real: 0.47s     RAM: 45908KB
$ time ./comb.exe
CPU: 1.38s      Real: 1.41s     RAM: 90472KB

lua -v
Lua 5.2.3  Copyright (C) 1994-2013 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
$ time lua comb.lua
CPU: 65.64s     Real: 65.81s    RAM: 264096KB

luajit -v
LuaJIT 2.0.3 -- Copyright (C) 2005-2014 Mike Pall.
$ time luajit comb.lua
CPU: 6.30s      Real: 6.34s     RAM: 132964KB

dart --version
Dart VM version: 1.8.5 (Tue Jan 13 12:44:14 2015) on "linux_x64"
$ time dart scomb.dart
CPU: 2.12s      Real: 2.24s     RAM: 93392KB

The code can be found on my dropbox (folder: num-comb), and here's the summary:

Compiler / InterpreterLanguageCompile DurationCompile RAMRuntime DurationRuntime RAMTotal Duration
g++ (debug)C++50194281940798041990
g++ (-O2)C++702126088079804950
clang++ (debug)C++50335641830797641880
clang++ (-O2)C++803786089079804970
javac, javaJava10506595213201104882370
phpPHP1026902497508102690
hhvmPHP1256036248812560
rubyRuby528708789252870
rbxRuby7489013532074890
node (typed array)Javascript2640922402640
node (untyped array)Javascript26801406122680
rhino (untyped array)Javascript87039199384887039
jsc-3 (typed array)Javascript237409374023740
jsc-3 (untyped array)Javascript1899018164418990
js24 (typed array)Javascript2130896882130
js24 (untyped array)Javascript1530923841530
goGo140315681100798241240
rustc (debug)Rust390106844106208602011010
rustc (-O2)Rust410110204970861081380
scalaScala54302060885430
python3Python 39047040319290470
python3 (array)Python 310682087248106820
pypyPython 253401367645340
pypy (array)Python 258502045885850
mcsC#440459081380904721820
luaLua6564026409665640
luajitLua63001329646300
dartDart2120933922120

Write down your opinion (or pastie if you found a bug on these source, or if you want to add more language implementation) on the comment section ^^)b

Note #1Opal (0.6.8) and JRuby (both 1.7.18 and 9.0.0pre1) failed to run this benchmark (they exceed 300s runtime limit even when using -J-Xmx3000M -J-Djruby.compile.mode=FORCE flag).

Note #2: Yes, it's unfair to compare array of integer and array of double, life is unfair by design, get over it...

String CombSort Benchmark update!

Previously, we have benchmark CombSort algorithm implemented in various programming language for array of number. Let's compare this algorithm with addition integer to string conversion the language's built-in string library. The benchmark should not use any other built-in function other than string, integer conversion and array generation and printing. The benchmark uses AMD A8-6600K, 16GB RAM with Non-SSD disk.

$ alias | grep 'alias time'
alias time='/usr/bin/time -f "\nCPU: %Us\tReal: %es\tRAM: %MKB"'
$ time --version
GNU time 1.7

g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 4.9.2 20141224 (prerelease)
$ time g++ -std=c++11 scomb.cpp
CPU: 0.18s      Real: 0.20s     RAM: 35868KB
$ time ./a.out
CPU: 19.32s     Real: 19.60s    RAM: 548912KB
$ time g++ -std=c++11 -O2 scomb.cpp
CPU: 0.20s      Real: 0.24s     RAM: 38184KB
$ time ./a.out
CPU: 13.76s     Real: 14.05s    RAM: 548816KB

clang --version
clang version 3.5.1 (tags/RELEASE_351/final)
$ time clang++ -std=c++11 scomb.cpp
CPU: 0.15s      Real: 0.20s     RAM: 42240KB
$ time ./a.out
CPU: 18.89s     Real: 19.21s    RAM: 548868KB
$ time clang++ -std=c++11 -O2 scomb.cpp
CPU: 0.20s      Real: 0.23s     RAM: 45824KB
$ time ./a.out
CPU: 13.87s     Real: 14.15s    RAM: 548820KB

javac -version
javac 1.7.0_71
$ time javac scomb.java
CPU: 1.13s      Real: 0.80s     RAM: 65324KB
$ time java scomb
CPU: 48.96s     Real: 27.59s    RAM: 906652KB

hhvm --version
HipHop VM 3.5.0 (rel)
$ time hhvm -v Eval.Jit=true scomb.php
CPU: 89.92s     Real: 90.38s    RAM: 877468KB

ruby --version
ruby 2.2.0p0 (2014-12-25 revision 49005) [x86_64-linux]
$ time ruby scomb.rb
CPU: 114.67s    Real: 115.21s   RAM: 870612KB

node --version
v0.10.35
$ time node scomb.js
CPU: 17.44s     Real: 17.41s    RAM: 411144KB

$ pacman -Qo `which jsc-3`
/usr/bin/jsc-3 is owned by webkitgtk 2.4.8-1
$ time jsc-3 scomb.js
CPU: 60.08s     Real: 43.66s    RAM: 834744KB

js24 --help | grep Version
Version: JavaScript-C24.2.0
$ time js24 scomb.js
CPU: 19.27s     Real: 19.62s    RAM: 735556KB

go version
go version go1.4.1 linux/amd64
$ time go build scomb.go
CPU: 0.14s      Real: 0.17s     RAM: 30428KB
$ time ./scomb
CPU: 11.45s     Real: 11.54s    RAM: 251628KB

scala -version
Scala code runner version 2.11.5 -- Copyright 2002-2013, LAMP/EPFL
$ time scala -J-Xmx3000M scomb.scala
CPU: 83.42s     Real: 46.10s    RAM: 1093924KB

python --version
Python 3.4.2
$ time python scomb.py
CPU: 121.33s    Real: 122.06s   RAM: 641844KB

pypy --version
Python 2.7.8 (c6ad44ecf5d8, Nov 18 2014, 18:04:31) [PyPy 2.4.0 with GCC 4.9.2]
$ time pypy scomb.py
CPU: 14.72s     Real: 14.97s    RAM: 522080KB

lua -v
Lua 5.2.3  Copyright (C) 1994-2013 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
$ time lua scomb.lua
CPU: 98.11s     Real: 98.54s    RAM: 863880KB

luajit -v
LuaJIT 2.0.3 -- Copyright (C) 2005-2014 Mike Pall.
$ time luajit scomb.lua
CPU: 21.30s     Real: 21.61s    RAM: 511268KB

dart --version
Dart VM version: 1.8.5 (Tue Jan 13 12:44:14 2015) on "linux_x64"
$ time dart scomb.dart
CPU: 11.92s     Real: 12.15s    RAM: 497788KB

The code can be found on my dropbox (folder: str-comb), and here's the summary:

Compiler / InterpreterLanguageCompile DurationCompile RAMRuntime DurationRuntime RAMTotal Duration
g++ (debug)C++180358681932054891219500
g++ (-O2)C++200381841376054881613960
clang++ (debug)C++150422401889054886819040
clang++ (-O2)C++200458241387054882014070
javac, javaJava1130653244896090665250090
hhvmPHP8992087746889920
rubyRuby114670870612114670
nodeJavascript1744041114417440
jsc-3Javascript6008083474460080
js24Javascript1927073555619270
goGo140304281145025162811590
scalaScala83420109392483420
python3Python 3121330641844121330
pypyPython 21472052208014720
luaLua9811086388098110
luajitLua2130051126821300
dartDart1192049778811920

Write down your opinion (or pastie if you found a bug on these source, or if you want to add more language implementation) on the comment section ^^)b

Note #1PHP 5.6.4, Rubinius 2.5.2, JRuby 9.0.0a1, Rhino 1.7, MCS 3.12 failed to end their execution within approx. 120s timeout

2015-02-20

Lesser String Associative Benchmark

Today we will benchmark about associative array (again) but with lower number of items, since most scripting language failed the previous benchmark. This time we will use lower number of input (only 1% of previous benchmark). The testing done in 64-bit Linux, Intel i3-4150 CPU @ 3.50GHz, 8GB RAM and Non-SSD hard disk. The code can be found on my dropbox (folder: assoc-small).

$ alias | grep 'alias time'alias time='/usr/bin/time -f "\nCPU: %Us\tReal: %es\tRAM: %MKB"'
$ time --version
GNU time 1.7

$ hhvm --version
HipHop VM 3.5.0 (rel) Compiler: 1422366928_06713107
$ time hhvm assoc.php
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 0.44s      Real: 0.59s     RAM: 96040KB

$ pacman -Q | grep ph7
ph7 2001004-1
$ time ph7 assoc.php
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 8.88s      Real: 8.93s     RAM: 112596KB

$ ruby --version
ruby 2.1.5p273 (2014-11-13 revision 48405) [x86_64-linux]
$ time ruby hash.rb
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 0.51s      Real: 0.53s     RAM: 36424KB

$ rbx --version
rubinius 2.5.2.c85 (2.1.0 e8a24276 2015-02-23 3.5.1 JI) [x86_64-linux-gnu]
$ time rbx hash.rb
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 3.29s      Real: 1.74s     RAM: 119228KB

$ jruby --version
jruby 9.0.0.0-SNAPSHOT (2.2.0p0) 2015-02-24 2a3dc1f OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 24.75-b04 on 1.7.0_75-b13 +jit [linux-amd64]
$ time jruby hash.rb
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 8.77s      Real: 3.83s     RAM: 288472KB

$ iojs --version
v1.0.4
$ time iojs object.js
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 33.85s     Real: 33.88s    RAM: 55676KB

/opt/nodejs4/bin/node --version
v0.4.12
$ time /opt/nodejs4/bin/node object.js 
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 16.77s     Real: 16.80s    RAM: 47124KB

node --version
v0.6.21-pre
$ time node object.js
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 16.96s     Real: 16.92s    RAM: 47128KB

node --version

v0.8.23
$ time node object.js
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 28.98s     Real: 28.93s    RAM: 50876KB

$ node --version
0.10.36-3
$ time node object.js
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 29.02s     Real: 28.96s    RAM: 51788KB

js24 --help | grep Version
Version: JavaScript-C24.2.0
$ time js24 object.js
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 0.34s      Real: 0.35s     RAM: 98480KB

pacman -Qo `which jsc-3`
/usr/bin/jsc-3 is owned by webkitgtk 2.4.8-1
$ time jsc-3 object.js
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 0.37s      Real: 0.40s     RAM: 87032KB

rhino < /dev/null 
Rhino 1.7 release 4 2014 07 01
$ time rhino object.js 
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 1.45s      Real: 0.93s     RAM: 179840KB

$ python3 --version
Python 3.4.2
$ time python3 dictionary.py

62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 1.01s      Real: 1.03s     RAM: 40992KB

$ pypy --version

Python 2.7.8 (10f1b29a2bd2, Feb 05 2015, 16:50:17) [PyPy 2.5.0 with GCC 4.9.2 20141224 (prerelease)]
$ time pypy dictionary.py
(62810, 62928, 12261)
(356028, 1118896, 222001)
CPU: 0.31s      Real: 0.32s     RAM: 102660KB

$ go version
go version go1.4.1 linux/amd64
$ rm -f map; 
time go run map.go 
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 0.27s      Real: 0.29s     RAM: 39340KB

$ lua -v
Lua 5.2.3  Copyright (C) 1994-2013 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
$ time lua table.lua 
62810   62928   12261
356028  1118896 222001
CPU: 0.60s      Real: 0.62s     RAM: 26692KB

$ luajit -v
LuaJIT 2.0.3 -- Copyright (C) 2005-2014 Mike Pall. 
$ time luajit table.lua
62810   62928   12261
356028  1118896 222001
CPU: 0.40s      Real: 0.42s     RAM: 19436KB

$ dart --version
Dart VM version: 1.8.5 (Tue Jan 13 12:44:14 2015) on "linux_x64"
$ time dart map.dart
62810 62928 12261
356028 1118896 222001
CPU: 0.31s      Real: 0.34s     RAM: 95780KB

And the summary

Compiler / InterpreterLanguageType NameData StructureRuntime DurationRuntime RAM
hhvmPHP 5.4arrayHash Table44096040
ph7PHP 5.3arrayHash Table8880112596
rubyRubyHashHash Table51036424
rbxRubyHashHash Table3290119228
jrubyRubyHashHash Table3830288472
iojsJavaScript ES6ObjectUnknown3385055676
node (0.4)JavaScriptObjectUnknown1677047124
node (0.6)JavaScriptObjectUnknown1696047128
node (0.8)JavaScriptObjectUnknown2898050876
node (0.10)JavaScriptObjectUnknown2902051788
js24JavaScriptObjectUnknown34098480
jsc-3JavaScriptObjectUnknown37087032
rhinoJavaScriptObjectUnknown1450179840
python3Python 3dictHash Table101040992
pypyPython 2dictHash Table310102660
goGomapHash Table27039340
luaLuatableHash Table60026692
luajitLuatableHash Table40019436
dartDartMapHash Table31095780

Note #1: Apparently my previous code for Python, JavaScript and PHP were wrong because I forgot to round the floating point division, I have updated the previous benchmark result.

Note #2: PHP 5.6.5 failed to build the associative array within 2200s

Note #3: I/O JS and NodeJS seems fast to build the associative array, but awfully slow when iterating array